The Aliens of Arxiv
After including some weirder astronomy pre-prints in ML Arxiv Hauls (a black hole Dyson sphere in #8 and a quiet/loud aliens power law in #9), I thought I should pool them into one post. I also found many more and re-discovered a set of links which I’d seen about solar sails.
It’d be interesting to study alien life academia… are they one-author passion projects with work on Vixra (an unfiltered alternative with free energy quacks), or tenured physicists collaborating after a long night at Astro-Con..? Are there departments where everyone has their own alien side project or one person is students’ alien paper mentor, etc. etc.
From a brief look: Most of this work is funded by the Breakthrough Foundation. Manasvi Lingam, Avi Loeb, and Amir Siraj have co-authored a lot of papers in this space, and there are two papers about interstellar beacons by three brothers (the Benfords). There are also papers such as “World Ships — Architectures & Feasibility Revisited” which get published in mainstream journals and don’t show up on Arxiv.
These pre-prints show particular interest in two phenomena with connections to science fiction: Dyson spheres and the visit of `Oumuamua, the first interstellar object observed passing through our solar system.
- The biggest role of a Dyson sphere in public discourse might be an episode of Star Trek: The Next Generation, or the Kardashev scale (Type 1, 2, 3 civilizations). Dyson was himself inspired by a 1930s sci-fi story. To me it seems unlikely to be buildable, and if it was some kind of nano-aluminum foil wouldn’t it be punctured by space debris all the time… The appeal to astronomers is primarily that they are so f-ing big, if a star somewhere in our galaxy, or a galaxy in our view were getting scaffolded, seems like we should be able to see that.
- The possibility of `Oumuamua being an alien-made probe/ship/sail/part is highly reminiscent of Rendezvous with Rama by Arthur C. Clarke, where colony ships (or life.zip packets) pass through our solar system. This connection was heightened when it was revealed that `Oumuamua had a cigar shape and was tumbling through space. It’s hard to believe, though, that the first interstellar object which we saw would also be a spacecraft? Loeb talks a bit about this work on the Lex Fridman podcast in Jan. 2021.
Author filters stars in the region of space where the 1977 Wow signal came from, down to 66 candidates and one particularly sun-like star. He cites Maccone (‘The Statistical Drake Equation’) who claimed the nearest communicating civilization is over 500 and most likely 1,933 light years away. The candidate star is 1,801 light years away. Author suggests we should focus on these and other candidate stars for exoplanet analysis and spectral readings.
It’s also possible that the Wow signal was an error or a comet.
Researchers are investigating life on Proxima b, the exoplanet of nearest neighbor star Proxima Centauri, after discovery in 2016. The authors suggest we could see nighttime lights with the James Webb Space Telescope or a future telescope. TBH this planet sounds hostile to life — 1/20th the distance to its sun, with no detected atmosphere, and half the planet in permanent daylight, half in nighttime (eyeball planet). Another paper warns that an asteroid belt might make it difficult for life to continue on Proxima b.
Even if a human-like civilization is on this planet, the paper estimates JWST will not get a great reading on our level of light. As a bit of a Hail Mary they add that aliens might have space mirrors to light up the dark side of the planet, and that would be more detectable.
The author discusses practicalities of a Dyson sphere. Dyson did not expect there would necessarily be a solid shell around a star, but that became the popular understanding. There are links/citations to studies of spheres around other non-star objects, including two from ‘the gray literature’ — a new term for me. He also mentions previous searches for Dyson spheres which included an investigation of Boyajian’s Star — though more recent research indicates it has an uneven dust cloud (some wavelengths pass through the occlusion so it is dust and not a solid structure) caused by being part of a binary star system.
The idea for separate orbiting structures, now-called a Dyson swarm, is covered in a different paper Viability of a Dyson Swarm as a Form of Dyson Sphere. Proposes we could build a swarm of these satellites on Mars.
Authors describe how white dwarf stars would be ideal to build Dyson spheres 4–10 million km across (2.5–6 million miles), with earth-like gravity on the outer shell.
A more recent paper discusses Infrared and Optical Detectability of Dyson Spheres at White Dwarf Stars but does not cite this one.
Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are milliseconds-to-seconds-long pulses, generally coming from outside our galaxy, which were first documented in 2007 and continue to be explored by astronomers.
After the 2016 discovery of Proxima b, Breakthrough Starshot proposed building a few grams probe with a solar sail, and accelerating it to 0.1c with an earth-based bank of lasers. This would require major advances in materials science, miniaturized tech for the craft, and in powering and cooling the lasers, but it’s our best shot at getting a look at Proxima b in our lifetimes.
This 2017 paper glues the two concepts together. The paper points to a few previous works on alien sails, but adds in newer observations and does some math. To explain the power of the beam, the authors estimate a million-ton sail, a million-ton ship (this is huge, like 3 Empire State Buildings), and a power beam from a planet twice as big as Earth. The peaked distribution of frequencies in FRBs is unusual compared to pulsars or other natural causes.
Only 17 FRBs had been seen at the time of this paper. Astronomers estimated 10,000 FRBs per day, which led the authors to estimate one might happen in our galaxy only once in several centuries. The first Milky Way FRB would be seen in 2020, linked to a magnetar. In late 2021, Chinese researchers detected 1,652 FRBs from a single galaxy.
One FRB has been found with a periodic pulse, which makes it easier to study. In 2021 its source was estimated to be only 1 km across. TBH all of this is weirdly in favor of the authors and aliens (except for the possibly natural origin of the magnetar), so I’d be interested to see this theory develop.
Not a whole lot of new evidence here, but lists several articles about resilience of viruses, bacteria, and tardigrades in the vacuum of space. Even nematodes were frozen and revived after 30–40,000 years.
A team from the Victoria University of Wellington discusses some physics which I am wholly unqualified to talk about, but does warn against a too-dense Dyson sphere approaching black hole physics.
A major solar flare last happened in the telegraph era and could screw us over at any time. The authors suggest placing a 100,000 ton magnetic shield (~weight of an aircraft carrier) at the Lagrange point. The estimated cost is $100 billion, which is 1% the damage of a devastating solar flare, though over time it should be easier to build the shield and more devastating to lose technology. Another option is enhancing the Earth’s own magnetosphere in some way to be better at deflecting. The authors believe these magnetic shields could be detectable by the James Webb Space Telescope.
The paper cites another on construction and observability of a shade to prevent global warming (Transit Detection of a “Starshade” at the Inner Lagrange Point of an Exoplanet). These shades would be nearly as large as a planet (as they are blocking photons instead of deflecting magnetic particles) and even more detectable.
Humans have only sent out radio signals and slow-moving probes for a short time, so even a nearby alien civilization might not know that we’re intelligent. Even if sun-like stars have a good chance of spawning friendly civilizations, the authors estimate 3,000–9,000 years before we get the first direct reply [a lot longer than the 50 year roundtrip to Vega in Contact]. At first I was excited by this paper, but once you get beyond specific nearby stars, you are really saying ‘I think the nearest comparable alien civilization is 1,500–4,500 light years away and a reply takes 2x that’.
In any case, this poses an extreme cost and scale to any effort to listen to the whole sky for this reply, to record our own messages and their responses, to come up with some common messaging language.
In a just-released paper, the three authors note that the interstellar meteor from 2014 was the hardest observed meteor (in terms of observed disintegration / impact / burn), and argue that the 3rd-hardest observed meteor will be shown to be interstellar (from 2017, not yet confirmed). The appearance of both known interstellar meteors at the high end of this scale is highly unusual.
Technical description from multiple authors about how we should send a probe to the next interstellar object.
The paper focuses on many objects on millennia-long orbits which regularly pass close to the Earth. The author suggests the easiest for SETI and sample missions to check out is 2016 HO3, now known as 469219 Kamoʻoalewa. The mainstream belief is that this object came from meteor impacts with the moon, and some similar objects are Aten asteroids.
The author argues sending messages to these objects is safer because their operators would already know humans exist, but an alien might discover Earth through our interstellar messages.
References to 2001, AI life, and von Neumann probes, which are cool.
The Benford brothers suggest that a lighthouse-like microwave beacon visible in other galaxies, which would cost only a few billion dollars. The main difficulty is sending a notable signal over 1,000 light years. They cover some cosmology around how our region of the Milky Way is nicely habitable, but we should expect much older (by a billion years) planetary systems and more civilizations closer to the center, beyond this 1,000 light-year threshold. This is the main reason for choosing microwaves over lasers and other proposed options.
The brothers’ other paper Searching for Cost Optimized Interstellar Beacons suggests searching for microwave beacons, and also mentions FRBs. The solar sail paper rejected this because the stellar-scale energy/power would be too high just to send a message or serve as a beacon.
Zuckerman has a history of studying alien flight from collapsing stars (he has a 1985 paper “Stellar evolution — Motivation for mass interstellar migrations” which also discusses a galaxy colonized by refugees, and Dyson spheres).
Here he co-authors a paper that humans or an alien civilization would anticipate the crisis and wait for a dwarf star to minimize the distance (in our case, Gliese 710 will pass within the Oort Cloud in 1.3 million years, but star-crossing would be more frequent nearer to the galactic core). This continued expansion leads the authors to estimate a probable two diaspora civilizations within 10 parsecs of us.
— Breaking alphabetical order to place a pro-solar sail paper ahead of three papers countering it.
In 2018, Bialy and Loeb published Could Solar Radiation Pressure Explain ‘Oumuamua’s Peculiar Acceleration? which is the more formal ‘it’s a solar sail’ paper. This 2021 paper ‘On the Possibility of an Artificial Origin’ is the latest and updated argument by Loeb that the unusual observations and motions fit a solar sail explanation. He compares its behavior closest to 2020 SO which was eventually explained as a flat piece of debris from a NASA rocket. Astronomers did not expect Pan STARRS to find any interstellar objects, and since then they have come up with only new classes of objects to explain it, so Loeb argues it is no more odd to propose that it is a solar sail.
New to me: a cometary `Oumuamua would be expected to have motion matching a nearby star system, but it was instead close to the galaxy’s Local Standard of Rest, matching only 0.2% of stars.
There is a bit of oddness at the end referring to Galileo’s persecution, Loeb’s book Extraterrestrial, and the Harvard project’s plans to build web-accessible telescopes with AI filters.
In a related paper, The Mass Budget Necessary to Explain Oumuamua as a Nitrogen Iceberg, Loeb and a co-author argue specifically against an iceberg explanation. They believe that if it is a natural object, these must be very common. In this case, they argue that there isn’t enough nitrogen in the universe for this population to be made up of nitrogen.
They also obliquely refer back to the preference for a solar sail:
The mass budget is reduced considerably if Oumuamua is a thin object, ≤1 mm
This paper was posted this month. Hard debunking of `Oumuamua as a light sail. Their arguments in summary: light sails would drift to an unaligned course and angle on an interstellar time scale, the sun did not push this object out of a typical Kepler orbit, and the unusual visibility/reflectivity is totally unlike what would be expected for a simulated sail. Future telescopes should be able to get a better look at future candidate objects. The authors leave a glimmer of hope that `Oumuamua could be the luckiest of a constellation of solar sail attempts, meaning we might have wayward sails to detect in the near future.
Curran argues that light sails are not suitable for high-speed travel without first solving the problem of slow acceleration (i.e. Breakthrough and the laser beam). The `Oumuamua trajectory hints at drifting for millions of years, which does not match the image of spacefarer aliens. Mostly a debunk of solar sails.
Zuckerman, previously discussed as a fan of spacefarer aliens, got cited by Curran in the previous paper so I took a look. His focus is on the usefulness of `Oumuamua as a probe. It seems strange for the craft to drift for thousands of years and then fly by so quickly, as that’s not useful for probing. Zuckerman believes a civilization with millennia of space launch capability would use space-based telescopes to study us with better detail.
In the mere 50 years of the space age, construction of [space-based planet-hunting telescopes] could easily have already begun, but has not because our species is out of control, due to overpopulation and overconsumption. Presumably any civilization that sends out probes that will take at least 50,000 years to reach their destinations has figured out a way to live sustainably in its biosphere
Making the sun more efficient by enclosing it in a Dyson sphere/blanket close to its surface.
I’d seen this paper before and wanted to track it down for this post. There are two classes of pulsars. The hyper-frequent ‘millisecond pulsars’ are only 10% of the population. They do not have as much noise or ‘glitching’ as ‘normal pulsars’, though two glitchy ones have been found. X-ray pulsars in particular could help if you/your system woke up in space or had lost track due to relativistic effects.
The author poses that one or multiple groups of aliens could have a way to create these high-energy millisecond pulsars, or manipulate them in some way. The more obvious use would be for navigation, but there could be some communication purpose. It seems like an expensive and difficult task for us but not for these aliens. The author proposes checking the distribution, emergence, changes, direction of pulsars to see if they appear attuned to specific regions where they might be traveling.
This work doesn’t seem fully necessary if pulsars naturally exist, though? The main reason for having this discussion is that pulsars are weird, and when first discovered, astronomers felt pulsars were like alien beacons, so maybe they are beacons.
In this 2019 paper (since revised with a supporting Tweet by US Space Command), Harvard astronomers show that CNEOS 2014–01–08, a roughly meter-wide meteor, had characteristics of an interstellar object before `Oumuamua, but got overlooked. They believe interstellar meteors are frequent, and propose a global spectroscopy network to see what’s burning off of them (about 1 observation/year, based on telescopes and land vs. sea area).
In a recent update, Harvard’s Galileo Project will attempt to recover a piece of this meteor (arxiv link for this expedition).
